Home | Contact Us | Log In
(888) 789-6604
Report Stack
Advanced search
Account Detail 0 items in basket
Order History Total $
Saved Searches View Basket basket
Backup Compound Strategies: Commercial and Tactical Considerations
Publication Date Sep 2012
Publisher Insight Pharma Reports
Product Type Report
Pages 250
Single User License $ 2495.00
Site User License $ 3995.00
Corporate User License $ 9950.00
 

Reportstack.com does not charge credit card fee, transaction charges, extra tax or VAT on any purchase.

Only about 20% of compounds that advance to clinical trials reach the market. Given this high rate of attrition and ever-increasing costs, companies need fallback plans as an alternative to canceling projects and writing off significant investments. Planning optimal backup compound strategies is often difficult. This Insight Pharma Report:  

  • Describes how companies are addressing strategic and tactical issues concerning backup compounds and predicts how they are likely to do so in the future
  • Provides perspective on best practices to adopt in addressing relevant backup compound issues and how evolution in de-risking technologies may affect those practices
  • Presents case histories that illustrate the use of backup compounds in practice
  • Examines strategic issues in backup compound selection and utilization, as well as tactical considerations, and investigates trends in the field
  • Covers business-related matters that bear significantly on backup strategies and tactics
  • Analyzes the results of an extensive Insight Pharma Reports survey conducted among individuals active in commercial small-molecule drug discovery
  • Includes complete transcripts of interviews with industry veterans who are highly knowledgeable about backup compound-related issues

Backup Compound Strategies: Commercial and Tactical Considerations begins by considering definitions for backup compounds, reviewing key literature references that present expert views on the topic, and presenting case studies that describe how medicinal chemists approach design and selection of backup compounds. Backup strategies currently in effect, and the types of issues companies consider when deciding whether to designate and advance backup compounds once a drug candidate is selected, are examined. These issues include the necessity for backup compounds; whether backup strategies are ad hoc or policy-based; whether to advance backups based on the same or different chemical scaffold as the prototype; how to best deal with addressing backup compound-related questions before a prototype has advanced to the stage where information needed for such decision-making becomes available; and the role of biomarkers and backup compounds in drug repositioning.

Backup Compound Strategies: Commercial and Tactical Considerations then considers tactical aspects affecting backup compound design and selection, focusing first on descriptive tools that are used to assess and compare how close candidate compounds come to meeting requirements for product viability: the target product profile and the clinical utility index. We then focus on the use of biomarkers to help predict how compounds will fare downstream in the pipeline. This includes the effects of biomarkers for predictive toxicology, predictive efficacy, and mechanism of action.

Backup compound strategies are next viewed from the business and commercial perspectives, and the effects of evolutionary changes in drug discovery R&D on backup compound strategies and tactics are considered. Decision and risk analysis tools that are employed, and their utility in dealing with backup compound-related issues, are described before turning to a discussion of backup compounds as viewed from the perspective of the project portfolio as well as with respect to in-licensing deals.

Results, conclusions, and observations from Insight Pharma Reports’ survey of individuals involved with commercial small-molecule R&D on practices, attitudes, and opinions concerning backup compounds are presented. Also examined is the impact of the changing role of medicinal chemistry in pharma, and trends suggesting how backup compound strategies and tactics may evolve in coming years.



This report features:

Hematological Cancer Therapies: Pipelines, Markets, and Business Considerations
Authored by Lucy J. Sannes, PhD, MBA | Published February 2012

Included in this report:

250 pages
16 Tables
Over 200 Companies 
Exclusive content not available in any other research report.

Executive Summary

Chapter 1
IntroductionNature and Scope of the Report

Chapter 2
Nature and History of Backup Compound Strategies
2.1. Definitions
2.2. Scientific and Business-Related Literature on Backup Compounds
2.3. Case StudiesPfizer’s Alpha7 Nicotinic Acid Acetylcholine Receptor Agonist Program
Amgen’s TRPV1 Antagonists
SKF Labs and Tagamet

Chapter 3
Strategic Considerations
3.1. Need for Backup Compounds
3.2. Backup Strategy: Ad Hoc or Policy-Based
3.3. Same Versus Different Chemical Scaffold for Backups
3.4. Backup Decisions Based on Scant Information
3.5. Backups and Drug Repositioning

Chapter 4
Tactical Considerations
4.1. The Target Product Profile (TPP)
4.2. The Clinical Utility Index
4.3. Use of Biomarkers to De-Risk Backups
4.4. Predictive Toxicology

Chapter 5
Business Considerations
5.1. Survey ResultsPosition Category
Work Focus
Formal vs. Ad Hoc Backup Strategy
Advancing Backups If Proof of Concept for Target Not Established
Backups for In-Licensing
Level of Advancement for Backup Compounds
Effects of Changes in Medicinal Chemistry Structures on Backup Compounds
Effect of Stakeholders on Backup Strategies
Recent Trend in Extent to Which Backup Compounds Are Advanced
Reasons for Abandoning Projects
Likelihood of Advancing a Backup Through Phase I Clinicals
Utility of In Vitro Predictive Toxicology in Qualifying Backup Compounds
Change in Emphasis on Backups Predicted in the Future
5.2. Evolution of the Pharmaceutical Industry and Effects on Backup Strategies
5.3. Risk and Decision Management Tools As They Affect Backup Strategies
5.4. Portfolio-Oriented Considerations and Backup Strategies
5.5. Backup Strategies When In-Licensing Drug Candidates
5.6. The Pfizer Torcetrapib Story

Chapter 6
Trends and Observations
6.1. Changing Role of Medicinal Chemistry in Pharma
6.2. Conclusions from Industry Survey

Chapter 7
Interview Transcripts
7.1. Bruce Littman, MD, President, Translational Medicine Associates
7.2. Malcolm MacCoss, PhD, Founder and Member, Bohicket Pharma Consulting
7.3. John A. Lowe III, PhD, Consultant, JL3 Pharma
7.4. William Greenlee, PhD, Principal, MedChem Discovery Consulting
7.5. Michael Liebman, PhD, Co-founder, IPQ Analytics and Managing Director, Strategic Medicine, Inc.
7.6. Perry B. Molinoff, MD, Professor of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

References

Company Index



TABLES & FIGURES

Figure 2.1. Pfizer’s Prototype Compound PHA-543613
Figure 2.2. Amgen’s Lead Compound AMG 517
Figure 4.1. Target Product Profile (TPP) in the Context of a Broader Strategic Evaluation Framework

SURVEY EXHIBITSExhibit 5.1. Nature of Organization (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.2. Nature of Position (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.3. Nature of Position (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.4. Nature of Position (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.5. Nature of Position (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.6. Work Focus (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.7. Work Focus (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.8. Work Focus (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.9. Work Focus (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.10. Backup Strategy in Organization Most Often (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.11. Backup Strategy in Organization Most Often (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.12. Backup Strategy in Organization Most Often (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.13. Backup Strategy in Organization Most Often (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.14. Percent of Projects for Which Proof of Concept for the Target Is Established Prior To Start of Medicinal Chemistry (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.15. Percent of Projects for Which Proof of Concept for the Target Is Established Prior To Start of Medicinal Chemistry (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.16. Percent of Projects for Which Proof of Concept for the Target Is Established Prior to Start of Medicinal Chemistry (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.17. Percent of Projects for Which Proof of Concept for the Target Is Established Prior To Start of Medicinal Chemistry (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.18. Likelihood of Advancing Backups If Proof of Concept for Target Is Not Established (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.19. Likelihood of Advancing Backups If Proof of Concept for Target Is Not Established (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.20. Likelihood of Advancing Backups If Proof of Concept for Target Is Not Established (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.21. Likelihood of Advancing Backups If Proof of Concept for Target Is Not Established (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.22. For High-Priority Projects with Unproven Targets, Designated Backup Compounds Tend To Be From the Same or a Different Chemical Series (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.23. For High-Priority Projects with Unproven Targets, Designated Backup Compounds Tend To Be From the Same or a Different Chemical Series (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.24. For High-Priority Projects with Unproven Targets, Designated Backup Compounds Tend To Be From the Same or a Different Chemical Series (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.25. For High-Priority Projects with Unproven Targets, Designated Backup Compounds Tend To Be From the Same or a Different Chemical Series (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.26. Desirability of Including Backup Compounds When In-Licensing Drug Candidates (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.27. Desirability of Including Backup Compounds When In-Licensing Drug Candidates (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.28. Desirability of Including Backup Compounds When In-Licensing Drug Candidates (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.29. Desirability of Including Backup Compounds When In-Licensing Drug Candidates (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.30. Likely Level of Advancement for Backup Compounds (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.31. Likely Level of Advancement for Backup Compounds (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.32. Likely Level of Advancement for Backup Compounds (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.33. Likely Level of Advancement for Backup Compounds (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.34. Effect of Recent Changes in Medicinal Chemistry in Pharma on Backup Strategies (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.35. Effect of Recent Changes in Medicinal Chemistry in Pharma on Backup Strategies (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.36. Effect of Recent Changes in Medicinal Chemistry in Pharma on Backup Strategies (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.37. Effect of Recent Changes in Medicinal Chemistry in Pharma on Backup Strategies (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.38. Level of Influence of Stakeholders on Backup Strategies (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.39. Level of Influence of Stakeholders on Backup Strategies (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.40. Level of Influence of Stakeholders on Backup Strategies (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.41. Level of Influence of Stakeholders on Backup Strategies (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.42. Change in Recent Years in Degree to Which Backup Compounds Are Advanced (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.43. Change in Recent Years in Degree to Which Backup Compounds Are Advanced (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.44. Change in Recent Years in Degree to Which Backup Compounds Are Advanced (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.45. Change in Recent Years in Degree to Which Backup Compounds Are Advanced (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.46. Reasons for Abandoning Projects (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.47. Reasons for Abandoning Projects (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.48. Reasons for Abandoning Projects (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.49. Reasons for Abandoning Projects (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.50. Likelihood of Work on Backup Compounds to Continue Through Phase I Clinical Studies as Candidate Vulnerabilities Come to Light (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.51. Likelihood of Work on Backup Compounds to Continue Through Phase I Clinical Studies as Candidate Vulnerabilities Come to Light (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.52. Likelihood of Work on Backup Compounds to Continue Through Phase I Clinical Studies as Candidate Vulnerabilities Come to Light (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.53. Likelihood of Work on Backup Compounds to Continue Through Phase I Clinical Studies as Candidate Vulnerabilities Come to Light (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.54. In Vitro Predictive Toxicology Level of Success in Qualifying Backup Compounds (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.55. In Vitro Predictive Toxicology Level of Success in Qualifying Backup Compounds (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.56. In Vitro Predictive Toxicology Level of Success in Qualifying Backup Compounds (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.57. In Vitro Predictive Toxicology Level of Success in Qualifying Backup Compounds (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.58. Change in Emphasis on Backup Compounds Expected During Next Five Years (Commercial, Small-Molecule Emphasis)
Exhibit 5.59. Change in Emphasis on Backup Compounds Expected During Next Five Years (Big Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.60. Change in Emphasis on Backup Compounds Expected During Next Five Years (Small to Midsize Pharma/Biotech)
Exhibit 5.61. Change in Emphasis on Backup Compounds Expected During Next Five Years (Pre-Commercial Pharma/Biotech)

Title Date Price
2013 Deep Research Report on China Human Use Rabies Vaccine Industry
By QYResearch
2013 Deep Research Report on China Human Use Rabie Vaccine Industry is a professional and depth research report on China Human Use Rabies Vaccine industry. This report has firstly introduced Human Use ...Read More
Jan 2013 $2000.00
By Netscribes (India) Pvt. Ltd.
May 2012 $0.00
Medical Devices Market in Russia 2009-2013
By Infiniti Research Ltd
Medical devices comprise surgical equipment & appliances, diagnostic devices, X-ray, ophthalmic equipment, laboratory devices & diagnostics, dental equipment, medical disposables and others.The Russia ...Read More
Mar 2010 $1500.00
1300 Smiles Limited (ONT) - Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare - Deals and Alliances Profile
By GlobalData
Summary1300 Smiles Limited (1300 Smiles) is a dental service company based in Australia. The company provides dentistry services to patients that include dental surgeries, practice management and othe ...Read More
Jan 2013 $250.00
2010 Perfect Vision GmbH - Medical Equipment - Deals and Alliances Profile
By GlobalData
2010 Perfect Vision GmbH - Medical Equipment - Deals and Alliances ProfileSummary20/10 Perfect Vision AG is engaged in the development, manufacturing and marketing of innovative technologies for raisi ...Read More
Jan 2012 $250.00
2010 U.S. Ambulatory Surgical & Emergency Centers Industry Report
By Barnes Reports
The U.S Ambulatory Surgical & Emergency Centers Industry report, published annually by Barnes Reports, contains timely and accurate industry statistics, forecasts and demographics. The report features ...Read More
Jan 2010 $149.00
2010 U.S. Biological Product Manufacturing Industry Report
By Barnes Reports
The U.S. Biological Product Manufacturing Industry report, published annually by Barnes Reports, contains timely and accurate industry statistics, forecasts and demographics. The report features 2010 ...Read More
Jan 2010 $149.00
2010 U.S. HMO Medical Centers Industry Report
By Barnes Reports
The U.S HMO Medical Centers Industry report, published annually by Barnes Reports, contains timely and accurate industry statistics, forecasts and demographics. The report features 2010 current and 20 ...Read More
Jan 2010 $149.00
2010 U.S. Home Health Care Services Industry Report
By Barnes Reports
The Home Health Care Services Industry report, published annually by Barnes Reports, contains timely and accurate industry statistics, forecasts and demographics. The report features 2010 current and ...Read More
Oct 2009 $149.00
2010 U.S. Kidney Dialysis Centers Industry Report
By Barnes Reports
The U.S Kidney Dialysis Centers Industry report, published annually by Barnes Reports, contains timely and accurate industry statistics, forecasts and demographics. The report features 2010 current an ...Read More
Jan 2010 $149.00

  * Required field
Name *
E-mail *
Telephone 
Company *
Country *
Query 
 
   

   
For support please
contact:
US Toll Free
+1 888-789-6604
Asia Pacific
+91-9425069161
 
 
To receive alerts about
an update, future offers and discounts on this report, signup here.
Email ID
 

Companies


A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Countries


A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z